The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views about how to make our roads safer. Personally, I disagree with the view that imposing stricter punishments is the only way to improve road safety because there is a range of other measures which could be used together to do this effectively.
Stricter punishments can certainly deter drivers from driving dangerously on the roads. Penalties for driving offenders can act as a deterrent, so that many drivers will think twice about avoiding traffic offenses. There have been numerous road accidents which are the inevitable consequences of carelessness or dangerously, for example using a mobile phone while driving a car or driving while intoxicated. Various types of driving penalties such as heavy fines, the confiscation of driving licenses or even a prison sentence should be adopted with dangerous drivers. These harsh punishments can make drivers follow the road rules and drive more carefully.
Nevertheless, I believe that the use of alternative measures by national and local authorities could promote driving safety. Firstly, it is essential to educate people properly before they start to drive. This could be done in schools or in more difficult driving tests to ensure drivers to be aware of implementing the letter of the law strictly. Secondly, many governments around the world have succeeded in using traffic calming measures such as speed bumps, road bends, speed cameras to cut the number of accidents, especially in built-up areas. Finally, governments or local councils could invest more in better public transport, which would mean that fewer people would need to work or travel by their private vehicles.
In conclusion, it its not enough to improve road safety by punishing more harshly driving offenders. I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced and used effectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36643835616 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8000612377 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2019651096 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.928571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239812088529 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873129218833 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789906313303 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166464798501 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755958120052 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.