In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend

Essay topics:

In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby. To what extent do you think this is a positive trend?

Sentiments diverge on whether the transition in the pure purpose of shopping from a daily task to a kind of entertainment could bring some adverse impacts on buyers. Although some advocate this vantage point as a negative trend, I am at loggerheads owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, shopping currently is considered by far the most effective approach to retrieve stresses and strains. It is a woeful fact that almost all women in the past were required to undertake every house chore from cleaning to preparing meals; therefore, going shopping was just a means of getting adequate supply for a whole family. This led to the pressure for them to finish this frequent task as soon as possible. By contrast, things turn out differently in this modern eporch. Browsing in distinct shopping malls or supermarkets is regarded as a magical method to unwind and pamper buyers after days of hard work. During their shopping time, they can freely choose and try any necessary items without worrying about time or deadlines. That is the reason why modern people on the whole express their satisfaction with their life more than the old generation.
Further and even more importantly, purchasing as a hobby is of its paramount importance to create a positive living style. There is no denial that people, especially women, find myriad obstacles in enlarging their social relationships, which attributes to the ignorance and anti society. On the other hand, no longer is it arduous for them to be open and approachable since they have someone who shares the similar interest. Hence, instead of staying secluded, people in this day and age are more sociable and active in light of being shared joy and sorrow with. My mother used to be an exemplary model of a striking wifehouse who did not go out more than an hour except for vital business. Fortunately, she currently becomes an absolute version due to the pleasure from shopping time with her neighbouring friends.
By way of conclusion, changing the obsolete perspective regarding shopping’s aim is easily a positive development.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, therefore, except for, kind of, on the whole, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06395348837 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80948135884 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665697674419 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1522327235 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.875 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167403470236 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483399346798 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339711277666 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981968173743 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325457323979 0.056905535591 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.