By paying more to employees based on their performance levels, you can keep their motivation high. Do you agree this is the best way to encourage employees?
There is a topical debate whether the employers ought to motivate their subordinates by giving them incentives and higher salaries if they positively contribute to increasing the company' s profits. I completely agree with this statement and I will give my reasons in this essay.
Firstly, I hold the view that providing high wages to people that have good performances will boost their willingness to continue having these results. In other words, this will bolster their creativity and imagination and they will also be more keen on working longer hours, in order to successfully complete the projects they were assigned for. Moreover, a better-paid manager will be more eager to give advises to his team, in terms of showing them their mistakes and alleviate the collaboration among the team' members, therefore ensuring that these employees will be able to timely accomplish their tasks.
Last but not least, having a reasonable income will lead to a higher standard of living for the individuals and this will enhance their actions of maintaining at least the same lifestyle they are getting used to. For instance, if an employee changes his housing for a luxurious accommodation, he will struggle to make a good impression at work, within the corporation, with the aim of getting promoted, in order to earn a sufficient amount of money and be able to pay his extortionate housing. As a result, he will not be on the verge of being deprived of the fancy conditions he is living in.
To sum up, although there are different ways of stimulating workers to achieve great performance at their workplace, I strongly believe that by offering a high income is of the utmost importance in ensuring good results, as this will not only provide them a strong team spirit but they will also be less apprehensive about their future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There is a topical debate whether the em...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I will give my reasons in this essay. Firstly, I hold the view that providing ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...able to timely accomplish their tasks. Last but not least, having a reasonable ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the fancy conditions he is living in. To sum up, although there are different ...
^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve great performance at their workplace, I strongly believe that by offering a hi...
^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost importance in ensuring good results, as this will not only provide them a str...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, at least, for instance, as a result, in other words, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96732026144 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83256240878 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.2045328544 49.4020404114 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.888888889 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 20.7667163134 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1111111111 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174925113297 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773834849564 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371633981383 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11523100254 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346531514222 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.