The peformance of staf can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to increase staff productivity?
In any stage of development of a company, it is undeniable that human resource is an imperative element contributing to the wealth of organizations. Therefore, employee management strategies ought to be implemented to encourage personnel to work more efficiently.
To commence with, it is commonly assumed that motivation is a great significant factor for anyone to strive for their best and enterprises can motivate employees in various ways. Firstly, there is the fact that if staffs, especially, fresh graduates, are vague in their career path at the beginning, they are likely not to have a high commitment to their current job and are easy to be distracted. Therefore, providing career orientation training courses with a mentee-mentor model in companies would help management boards understand their staff’s potential talent as well as their desires so that they can give valuable advice as well as support employees to build long-term plans for their careers. Secondly, motivation could originate from the recognition of the efforts an individual has spared to complete the project on time. In fact, should personnel dedicate themselves to companies but not receive any compliments, they would hold the thought that they do not need to endeavor like that anymore but still be paid similarly to others. Hence, companies should organize yearly awards where they admire the top performers in front of their families and the whole team as well as give such employees more opportunities for higher promotion.
The second aspect worth mentioning is providing a comfortable and friendly working environment where staff does not have to worry about petty things out of their scope of jobs and are willing to dedicating to companies. The foremost step that firms could take is that they can offer necessities to the employees such as health insurance for them and their family members and decent salary that ensure a good life quality. Otherwise, the concerns about living costs could lessen the level of concentration on working. Secondly, it is demanding for a workspace with no colleague conflicts where everyone knows how to cherish their difference and value contradicting opinions in order to obtain common goals together. This requires business owners to have effective approaches to connecting people in a team, for example, organizing bonding-team meetings so that members could understand each other more. As a result, people would have the feeling that every day they go to work is enjoyable and full of inspiration where colleagues are close friends and always supportive.
In conclusion, companies can increase productivity by creating an ideal working environment so that people are inspired to work their best and enjoy the time working without any concern.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32346241458 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92653708676 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578587699317 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9593936055 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.8 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2666666667 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141846907838 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422983877878 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440107067854 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854124974955 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608584504454 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.