People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that people at the present day are affordable in purchasing cheap products. Despite its positive benefits, I do believe that the drawbacks hold up to be more serious regarding the future.
It is understandable that being able to buy cheaper products is substantially beneficial. Firstly, buyers tend to purchase a wide range of products, which will be profitable for sellers or companies. This helps to open the floodgates to numerous establishments for new branches all over the world, and proving more job opportunities for the residents. The unemployment issue, therefore, will be reduced, boosting one’s country economy. Finally, being affordable to own whatever they want might let the people fall into the state of euphoria, which could raise the happiness rate for the country.
However, I strongly believe that purchasing cheaper goods has its downsides which seem overshadow the benefits. Firstly, individuals who enjoy buying inexpensive commodity might be faced with the risk of deception. This could lead to health damage in terms of anxiety and depression. Furthermore, if the customers become accustomed to buying whatever they want plus that the increase in demand motivates manufacturers to speed up their operating process, this could be relevant to the massive negative impacts that might harmful to the environmental sustainability. For instance, approximately 60,000 deaths of cancer happen annually due to pollution caused by factories.
In conclusion, people’s access to cheaper products has its good sides. However, the shortcomings are more remarkable that they should be taken into serious consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers to speed up their operating process, this could be relevant to the massive ne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58964143426 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11679089545 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645418326693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2105724691 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.214285714 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112433482397 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454001695744 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634022440512 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767681801157 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244120877494 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.