Tourism is becoming increasingly important as a source of revenue to many countries, but its disadvantages should not be overlooked.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Tourism industry seems to boom nowadays within many countries and, therefore, is looked at as a prime source of the national income. While taking serious steps to improve this sector is essential, I strongly recommend that the downsides thereof should be considered adequate.
First and foremost, tourism bears potential threat to the ecosystem. Due the increased activity of planes flying over the regions and means of transports, such as cars and buses, the whole environment is likely to suffer. This, accordingly, results in putting people’s lives at risk. World Health Organization (WHO), to illustrate, conducted a study about the possibility of having lung diseases in several countries. They found that they higher the levels of tourist activity a country has, the higher the possibility of its people to suffer from respiratory-related illnesses. The organization, therefore, gave a few recommendations, including reducing the levels of tourists being hosted every year; since people’s lives matters.
Another pressing issue, especially for the indigenous people, is the lack of job security. Most jobs associated with tourism are season-based. This means that a lot of people in this industry are facing the risk of unemployment during the non-touristic months. Namely, in the town where I come from, the people are totally relying on tourism that flourishes, particularly, in December, July and August, when domestic visitors and international tourists flood the popular hotspots of the country. By the time they start leaving, those temporary employees become gradually jobless. This happens every year.
To sum up, I am wholeheartedly for the idea of addressing the drawbacks of tourism, such as the environmental abuse and job instability; while, in the same time, maintaining reasons to a good tourism experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, look, so, therefore, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55516014235 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14888106031 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658362989324 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6107959865 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120519266136 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339270155242 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336484151018 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734219477578 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396499903304 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.