In today's world, private companies rather than the government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages of this trend are more than the disadvantages?
Governmental entities used to appropriate great deals of its wealth for the scientific research. However, the majority of the scientific research has been taken over by the non-governmental businesses recently. While there are both advantages and disadvantages to such a novel approach, the downsides seem to take precedence over the potential benefits.
Those who support the notion of the private businesses funding the science cite the associated benefits that will bring to people. Firstly, by affording the bill of the scientific studies, those firms will support the national budgets of their respective states, thus create more room for the government to fund people’s staple needs, such as commodities, education and healthcare. Secondly, science is likely to flourish under the mandate of private companies. Having known that they are the immediate beneficiaries, they will want to maximize the ROI. The more money they raise, the more wealth they will reap, especially with promising projects. This will lead to magnificent competitions between rivals.
However, despite the above mentioned benefits, this trend can impact the research industry at different levels. Firstly, not only will this lead to certain businesses having monopoly over the scientific means, it will possibly be employed to serve narrow interests of the ultimate owner, which could be contradict the public interest. Tobacco firms in some countries, for instance, could manipulate the results which were originally showing how harmful the smoke is to the health. This resulted in them losing their credibility. Further, the research will likely avail those firms in the first place, rather than the public; unlike government-funded studies. In other words, private funders will sell the breakthroughs to whoever pays more in order to achieve the utmost financial outcomes and gain reputation regionally as well as internationally.
In conclusion, having introduced both the pros and cons of private sector funding the scientific research, it is obvious that the downsides outweigh the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cedence over the potential benefits. Those who support the notion of the priv...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificent competitions between rivals. However, despite the above mentioned ben...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gionally as well as internationally. In conclusion, having introduced both th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62857142857 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95155134273 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4833690221 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8125 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207537220617 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614595427415 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351315244866 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116598026764 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315194929662 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.