Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport construction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destinations Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by tax

In the recent decades, airlines has been more popular that significantly effects to the environment particularly noise pollution, contaminated air and airport building. It is claimed that economic tickets, especially to holiday destinations play a dominant role in increase of air transport. Some people believe that air traffic will be reduced if the authorities release some policies to rise the tax. In my opinion, I totally agree with that idea and I will explain it with the most reliable evidences.
First of all, many passengers choose to travel by plane because of convenience that leads to a lot of problems details. In other words, the growth of air traffic cause environmental pollution, noise sounds and construction for flights. Before, because of expensive tickets, air traffic did not attract any passengers. However, the price of flights are changed to be cheaper which is affordable to medium customers, often to short holiday. It is advantageous to travel by plane because it takes shorter time and easy to transfer to many places. Due to the fact that normal travelers are the target of airport campaigners, the best solution to decrease air traffic is taxing it more heavily.
Moreover, using airways to move in emergency situations is necessary but people should not abuse it. Rising the tax will put the pressure on the airplane business and the flights will cost higher. As a result, the customers will try to catch another vehicle instead of air traffic. Anyway, it may be a wonderful experience to travel by other vehicles such as train, ship or bus.
In conclusion, airlines help people to take the advanced traveling but in other ways, it is harmful to environment. Therefore, air traffic needs to be limited by high tax.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or flights. Before, because of expensive tickets, air traffic did not attract any...
^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it. Rising the tax will put the pressure on the airplane business and the flights...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06228373702 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8476310376 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0112474699 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9375 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367175096535 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104739482787 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793344163263 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196204620088 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601974898138 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.