People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life. What are these problems? Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns?

Nowadays, the vast majority of people choose to live in big cities in search for a better life. As a result, it witnessed a significant increase in the population, which brings many drawbacks that affect negatively to people’s lives. Therefore, in my opinion, the government should mitigate this problem by migrating people to smaller regional towns to reduce the population densities.

To begin with, the problem caused by a variety of factors. First, due to the remarkable increase in the number of vehicles, city-dwellers have to deal with the congestion traffic every day. In addition, with such number of vehicles moved on street, accidents are inevitable. Thus, the demand for medical treatment increasing significantly which may lead to the overwhelmed. Moreover, the more private cars the more carbon-dioxide is produced to the air. As a result, breathing in that polluted air in long run cause numerous serious diseases such as respiratory disease and lungs cancer.

To mitigate these problems, the government should take an action by encouraging the resident to migrate to the smaller regional towns. Firstly, the reason why people have a tendency to live in a big city is that there are more high-paying jobs available. Therefore, to solve this, the authority should have complementary policies to move or attract more companies, factories to build their office in this town. Furthermore, the government need to adjust the nation budget to develop the transport infrastructure which interconnects other villages. They also need to build more schools with qualitative facilities to encourage young families to raise their children here.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that living in a large city brings many advantages. However, the citizen today are dealing with many problems in their everyday life. Therefore, I personally believe that the government should encourage them to migrate to smaller towns by constructing more facilities.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44262295082 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04447724728 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4409179379 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6470588235 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387136444213 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105826314121 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907821309203 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245415112386 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130742005963 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.