Over the past decades, urbanization never failed to have public attention and spark controversial. Although this phenomenon is considered that an upward trend among developing countries throughout the world, the issue as to whether governments should implement the policy advocate residents move to regional town or not remains controversial. To the best of my knowledge, this action of governments is unnecessary for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is important to recognize that immigration to urban can improve the living quality of inhabitants. Many argue that living in major cities, individuals have to deal with many problems such as fast pace of life, expensive life fees, isolation, especially, the region discrimination, this argument could be true to some extent. However, they should take into account of the fact that these problems mentioned above just are a part of living in large cities, only individuals who do not have enthusiasm, enduring to hardship will be eliminated, and the other part of city dwellers will be accessed to modern, all-side lifestyle. For example, many prestigious universities and hospitals which are applied international, logical curriculum and integrated sophisticated equipment are located in major cities, therefore, living in urban children can be provided a best education and heavy patients or the aged can be took care sufficiently. This example indicates that albeit hardly, living in big city are have more benefit than its cons.
Secondly, it is equally important to recognize that urbanization plays an instrument role in national development. Opponents may argue that increasing population in city is pressuring in local government. However, this justification is groundless because more residents from remote areas move to metropolises more high-tech labors come. For instance, when inhabitant from rural areas move to cities many companies will established, governments will collect a considerable revenue from taxes and infrastructure will be invested lead to attract more investment from overseas. This example shows that encourage residents move to urban both governments and inhabitants are beneficiaries.
In conclusion, under no circumstances should governments not implement the policy which encourage individuals move to remote areas because living in metropolises not only improve resident’s living quality but also bring huge revenue as mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...untries throughout the world, the issue as to whether governments should implement the policy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 866, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...iving in urban children can be provided a best education and heavy patients or th...
^
Line 2, column 1011, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...t albeit hardly, living in big city are have more benefit than its cons. Secondly, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'establish'
Suggestion: establish
...reas move to cities many companies will established, governments will collect a considerabl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onclusion, under no circumstances should governments not implement the policy whi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2072.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73961218837 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19416888015 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573407202216 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3220558319 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.0 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7857142857 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209270829635 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634975088916 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488069310501 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116454640238 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320719672297 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.