People in many countries are spending less time with their family. What are the reasons, and effects of this?
Nowadays, with the rapid growth of the world, the society it creates also becomes more competitive pressurizing. As a result, people in many countries are spending less time with their family.
Firstly, the younger people today are facing a lot more pressure ever than before. Young children in this day and age are under great pressure from study, and typically children in Asian nations usually spend about 10 hours a day and 6 days a week at school, not to mention extra classes in the evening. So, he/she ends up having no time to spend with his/her family but rather friends. Adults are too occupied with their work and social relationships. For example, in countries like Japan where people spend the major proportion of their life working, officers and worker tend to stay at work until late evening and then they would attend exchanges with colleagues before going home.
There are several impacts of this trend, and they all tend to be detrimental. Firstly, parents who do not often care about their offspring will make them more vulnerable to psychological trauma. Many studies show that young children who are not cared for and lived without love, attention from parents are at high risk of developing autism. Secondly, the lack of interaction between family members would increase the gap generation between parents and children without family bonding time. The consequence is leading to conflicts and unhappiness.
In conclusion, people are having less and less time with family largely due to work and study pressures and the impacts of this on both individuals and families are severe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-04 | uyenmia | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | tsln7607 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | Nguyễn Văn Việt | 92 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | remienn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | hanhkatori2402 | 78 | view |
- The line diagram outlines information about the number of clients of five correspondence administrations worldwide through the span of 10 years beginning from 1998 73
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 10
- The maps below show information about the change of Riverage college 30 years ago and now 79
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07547169811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52067562863 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618867924528 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4734330572 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.461538462 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370250437199 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125827594283 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144686504271 0.0667982634062 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247891242451 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940068757223 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.