The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.What can companies do to increase staff productivity?

Essay topics:

The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company.

What can companies do to increase staff productivity?

It is an evidence-based fact that the capacity of workforce is one of the substantial factors of the rising economy of a company. There are variety of ways how to enhance the quality of work and service, that this essay will discuss.

First of all, if workers are fitter and less stressed, their working time will be more efficient leading to higher level of output. By subsidizing memberships of gyms and sports clubs, employers can motivate their employees to be healthier and thus more effective at work due to the fact that work/life balance of a worker will be improved.

Financial rewards is another driving force factors which can be used in order to achieve high productivity. Employers might set annual target-related payments such as pay increments, perks, bonuses, or incentives for those who archive aimed milestones announcing their names during performance reviews and appraisals, as revalry among employees leads to being more committed.

Similarly, providing regular trainings and having job prospects are indispensable elements in efficacy of a worker. All employees are seeking for opportunities to further their career and acquire more knowledge without leaving work, so it is reasonable to have on the job trainings and internship programmes for career progression, because the more the rate of job satisfaction, the better productivity of a company. A recent research, for instance, conducted in Baku has shown that among all local businesses the most sucsessful one is AF business center which provides monthly trainings with foreign teachers and professors in business and economy field.

Overall, by using of health-related subsidies, ongoing trainings, and some rewards to salaries an enterprise can encourage its employees to be more assadous to produce useful results at work.

Votes
Average: 2.4 (3 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... driving force factors which can be used in order to achieve high productivity. E...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, so, thus, for instance, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41696113074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02827473601 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636042402827 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3278127851 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.3 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0778485655989 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031063448202 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236137018362 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412465870826 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0112510228983 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.