A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In these days, social status and material possessions become criterias to evaluate an individual's value. some people insist that ancient worth namely honour, kindness and trust may not play a vital role anymore. From my view, I completely disagree with this opinion because of the following reasons.
people often tend to judge a person depending on social status and material possessions that is extremely reasonable. some people gaining high social status often have an influence in the society because they made efforts and accumulated knowledge as well as experience. they also work hard through hours to make money and own asset such expensive car, house or clothes. For example, a doctor have to learn from seven to nine years to get professional degree before becoming a role - model job in the society or a famous singer must work more than ten hours per day to own a huge income and pay for costly items. Therefore, they totally deserve to evaluate highly thanks to their social status and asset.
On the other hand, Old-fashioned values like honour, kindness and trust still are respected. There are number of ceremonies established to remember them. also, many campaigns launched and funded to support veterans. In the 21th century, people living in peaceful world, they are grateful for people sacrificing themselves to protect the country.
In conclusion, In order to evaluate a person’s worthy, people should observe from many views. A person having high social status or old-fashioned values that always deserves to appreciate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...erias to evaluate an individuals value. some people insist that ancient worth namely...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on because of the following reasons. people often tend to judge a person depe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...cause of the following reasons. people often tend to judge a person depending ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ssessions that is extremely reasonable. some people gaining high social status often...
^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ulated knowledge as well as experience. they also work hard through hours to make mo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ks to their social status and asset. On the other hand, Old-fashioned values ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 156, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...eremonies established to remember them. also, many campaigns launched and funded to ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26907630522 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64192656976 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642570281124 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1721754686 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7857142857 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213706621435 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761022511158 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729119762982 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13550718248 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478621845578 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.