In the present era, children are found to have fewer responsibilities than it used to be in the past time.
Recently, many kids have a significant decrease in the number of their responsibilities. While many people consider this an exceptional phenomenon, some of them think it is dreadful. This essay will argue why having fewer duties is advantageable but why having more of them for kids is ultimately superior.
To begin with, kids are benefited from carrying fewer obligations to some extent. This is because they have a chance to spend their spare time to pursue their interests. For instance, a lot of students at my school, Korea Science Academy, are extraordinarily busy with their schoolwork while my friends in Indonesian schools barely have any homework. As a result, those who have a meager amount of homework can do exciting projects, which match their passion. It is, therefore, clear that having not many responsibilities is actually an intelligent idea.
However, there is a primary drawback for some kids having fewer duties. If they do not have any initiative to be productive, they will end up wasting their precious time. Consequently, they tend to be less successful in the future. From my observations, my lazy friends in Indonesian schools have a tough time finding jobs, and they have not managed to get some money. Hence, it is not always a smart move to let children just sit down and relax.
In conclusion, this essay argued why having a lot of leisure time is profitable but why being busier with responsibilities is better for children. In my opinion, it is absolutely more preferable for kids to have more necessary work to do.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99230769231 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0034890953 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7098247037 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207785551036 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075382597034 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465923317825 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138924832956 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039257839669 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.