At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
In the contemporary world, the number of younger generation is increasing rapidly compared to the senior ones, in some countries. This situation generates both positive and negative aspects in the long run.
The obvious argument in favor is that, young adults are the viable sources of improvement for the country in terms of science and technology. Having been fresh minded, they produce ideas those are fruitful and creative in these fields. Moreover, youthful people are effective and efficient employees for employers since they have great responsibility and flexibility towards their job. For instance, in some of western countries only qualified youthful workers are applied for job areas as the work hours are so long which may be inappropriate for senior employees because of their physical endurance.
There are, however, some drawbacks. Decreasing number of older generation has serious impacts on culture and tradition. Dying out of cultures leads to the similarity among countries and people soon start to think similarly leaving their old customs and traditions behind. Furthermore, old generations are the means of information and good role models for the youth. They play a vital role in decision making process as they have great experience and skills those are achieved throughout their life. Nevertheless, cultures and information about history can be obtained from them plainly by young generation.
To conclude, senior citizens should not be considered as a burden for the country, however, young generation has more opportunities to contribute to the country. Hence, it is more advantageous for a country to have an active workforce than dependant seniors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49615384615 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87839071985 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634615384615 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9960249705 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116597373933 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438177571706 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415237380546 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782813919371 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405215756523 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.