Q19: Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the question of how to support emerging countries has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that practical advice and assistance for less-developed nations should take precedence over financial help, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that financial support can benefit third world countries a great deal do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that an astronomical amount of money is required to build a high quality of infrastructure, including railways and roads, which makes it possible for poorer countries to invigorate economic growth. In fact, these nations are not able to establish facilities without receiving monetary assistance from global charities. In addition, a multitude of citizens in Africa are suffering from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced meals. If it were not for monetary help from global charitable foundations, they would have difficulty leading a better life.
My opinion, however, is that more emphasis should be placed on practical aid and technical advice than monetary support. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that although it seems beneficial for developed countries to give financial aid in the short term, first world countries that have a myriad of invaluable skills and experiences derived from trial and error should teach these to developing countries considering that receiving practical skills enables them not only to achieve economic and political progress but also to become less dependent on other countries in the long term. Furthermore, a large number of developing nations often suffer from high levels of corruption preventing the masses from having an improved standard of living. Thus, if they obtain numerous pieces of advice from experts in global institutions, this phenomenon would be alleviated. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that practical support and advice should be a priority for the reasons discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...from global hunger as well as a lack of basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ountries in the long term. Furthermore, a large number of developing nations often suffer from hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that practica...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, third, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41778975741 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87468803024 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601078167116 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.0715240756 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1875 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208255799687 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577081792371 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609946465406 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119666307412 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699206804411 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.