Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Recently, the issue of living abroad has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that residing in a nation where a foreign language is spoken can lead to practical and social problems, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, it seems difficult to refute the idea that there are a number of advantages that can be derived from dwelling overseas. Perhaps the principal benefit is that people can get a chance to have a tight grasp of a foreign language considering that they are always exposed to an environment where they have to speak in a language apart from their own language. Furthermore, people who have experiences of living in a foreign country are more likely to compete with their counterparts with greater ease in the job market owing to their language skills. To exemplify, one recent study conducted by Seoul National University has demonstrated that the majority of companies in South Korea have a predisposition to hire employees who are multilingual given that a great deal of their business revolves around global trading. For these reasons, there does seem to be a solid basis for the claim that residing in a foreign country should be encouraged.
On the other hand, it seems short-sighted to contend that living in an overseas nation merely brings with it positives. The most oft-cited argument against such a view is that the language barrier often prevents people who are not fluent in a second language from communicating with speakers of it, making them have difficulty in having a deeper understanding of other cultures and can even result in cultural conflicts. In addition, being forced to speak in a language other than one's mother tongue could cause people to suffer from dealing with their small tasks that seem to be insurmountable, including doctors' appointments and going shopping, which can even exert a negative influence on the quality of their life. In light of the above, I also find these persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 482, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...orced to speak in a language other than ones mother tongue could cause people to suf...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...above, I also find these persuasive. In conclusion, it is undeniable that there...
^^
Line 8, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, while, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1999.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07360406091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8051932143 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560913705584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.3925269363 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.266666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196635500591 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598498745627 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498777386758 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113296896774 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354381253827 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.