In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. Why are these changes happening? Do you think these changes are positive and negative?
It is true that the traditional notion of the family structure and the role of family members have considered as a thing of the past in the modern life. There have been several changes which, in my opinion, have been really positive.
There are two changes in family roles and structure which could be seen easily. In terms of the family structure, there has been an increasing number of people nowadays who prefer living in a nuclear family instead of in an extended family with three or more generations dwelling under the same roof. In roles terms, after marriage, rather than staying at home as housewives and performing the majority of household tasks as well as looking after children, more women have decided to continue to pursue their own careers. As a result, in many households, husbands now help their spouses to do chores which were once considered as “women’s work”.
I consider such developments as positive for several reasons. The first reason is that children in modern nuclear families could learn to be independent at very early stage since they are sent to a nursery school in which these preschoolers play and learn to socialize. This also enables their grandparents to enjoy old age more fully since they do not need to take care of their grandchildren. An another reason is that a double income allows parents in small families to not only enjoy a higher standard of living but also invest more in their children’s education. Consequently, an abundant financial resource is certainly a great support for their offspring to pursue a higher education in the future. Armed with necessary qualifications, they would make their way in the modern world of work.
In my opinion, there are several losses of the traditional family system and roles, and I believe that these have taken place as positive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a reason' or 'another reason'.
Suggestion: A reason; Another reason
...ed to take care of their grandchildren. An another reason is that a double income allows parents ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, really, so, well, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00974025974 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82188061478 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.914700179 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194639798684 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693895728245 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614760133923 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129220233789 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319649485154 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.