In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship
between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe
that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others
believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only
if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual
merits.
What is your view of the relationship between equality and personal
success?
In the modern world, where nepotism prevails in almost all the growing sectors, people look ahead to find a balance between equality and individual accomplishments. Many people are of the view that in an unbiased social structure, a lot can be achieved in the success quotient, while many others often believe in the individual's talent as the ladder for success. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on the driving forces behind this mentality, followed by my personal view.
To begin with, in an unprejudiced society, everyone enjoys the taste of equal rights and opportunities irrespective of social creed and caste. Even the less-fortunate and impoverished people get stimulated to showcase their talent in the fore-front. In addition, the black market of corruption gets no chance to raise its head under the umbrella of nepotism. For instance, the highly prevailed terms such as preference, disparity, and discrepancy stay out of the egalitarian system, while appointing the true talent. Hence, it is an irrefutable fact that for a burgeoning society, equality in all aspects is an essential factor.
By contrast, a section of society believes that freedom to work at one's own pace leads to an actual level of achievement. It is often seen that the success of any economy is inevitable if people work in an open environment without getting intimidated by any failure. for example, in a relaxed and stress-free culture, they can explore niche to highlight their hidden talent. So, to enlighten the future of young children, a level of independence can go a long way to fulfill the quest for a successful life.
To conclude, although views on equality and personal success vary largely among the masses, however, in my opinion, it is erroneous to say that both the given terms are different from each other. I believe that facilitating them with equal rights is highly synonymous with tasting the true sweetness of personal growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 318, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
... while many others often believe in the individuals talent as the ladder for success. This ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...out getting intimidated by any failure. for example, in a relaxed and stress-free c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14420062696 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9189043752 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611285266458 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6905812042 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226222510758 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621786768246 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508912302404 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128058754263 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068242336486 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.