Recently facebook become one of the most popular sites on the internet and young people are spending an increasing amount of time on this site.
what are some negative effects of spending too much time on facebook?
Nowadays, people have many methods and means to connect with each other. In particular, Facebook is a social networking site that a lot of people use. This has been seen in some studies, more than 70% of internet user in Vietnam use facebook, so it causes some negative effects to anyone who use Facebook too much. There us no justification for using Facebook too much to bring a lot of negative effects on users including health, relationships, psychology and emotions.
The negative effect of using too much facebook is effecting your health.
Firstly, using Facebook for a long time will directly affect your vision. The blue light of the phone or computer when we are exposed to it for too long to surf facebook will make our eyesight decrease. Secondly, when people spend too much time surfing Facebook, their sleep time will be less, making their body feel tired and cause other diseases. Actually, using facebook has very direct effects on people's health.
The negative effect of using too much facebook is effecting your relationship.
Firstly, using the social network Facebook can reduce interaction between people. Interaction between people in the present era is significantly reduced, when people sit next to each other, but do not talk to each other in words, make eye contact, but exchange information through Facebook. We can make friends with so many friends online but we are ignoring the real relationships, the real feelings people give to us. Along with that, communication and behavior skills are also gradually lost. Second, because Facebook is a virtual social network, many people hide themselves, live differently, gradually lose the right to communicate with those around them, where people can directly make friends and chat with real people. people are immersed in the virtual world, they become inferior to themselves in real life. As a result, close relationships stretch, space for friends is gone, they live in isolation in front of a phone or computer screen.
The negative effect of using too much facebook is effecting your psychology. Facebook is a miniature society. There are also a lot of good people, bad guys. There are many unhealthy images, pages with bad content, causing psychological shock, thinking of young people, receiving bad and false information, leading to misperceptions. In addition, the influence of "netizens" through facebook is huge. Just one click of impolite likes, shares or comments also makes you mentally affected. It is that killing many people, depriving others of many things just to satisfy themselves. The more you use Facebook, the more negative you feel, even leading to depression. The result of that is to leave regrets, loss both physically and mentally.
The negative effect of using too much Facebook is effecting your emotions. The serious consequence of using Facebook too much is turning people into emotionless people. When not interested in everything around, they only pay attention to the amount of likes and shares on social networks. In an accident, one person was injured, instead of helping, many people took their cameras to take photos, film and post them on their personal pages to attract followers or "Keyboard Heroes" who are willing to rush to judge, criticize about any individual, any event even though they do not understand all. Perhaps we are all too familiar with information about emotionless lives on Facebook.
To sum up , using Facebook has huge consequences in terms of health, relationships, psychology and emotions.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...make friends and chat with real people. people are immersed in the virtual world, they...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts, loss both physically and mentally. The negative effect of using too much Faceb...
^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ch Facebook is effecting your emotions. The serious consequence of using Facebook t...
^^^
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...motionless lives on Facebook. To sum up , using Facebook has huge consequences in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, in addition, in particular, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2983.0 1615.20841683 185% => OK
No of words: 571.0 315.596192385 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22416812609 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84291053758 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499124343257 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 932.4 506.74238477 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 16.0721442886 199% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7466770554 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.21875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.84375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 3.9879759519 476% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325527804712 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945750456785 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837936545239 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180001853901 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758974471381 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 727, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...make friends and chat with real people. people are immersed in the virtual world, they...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ts, loss both physically and mentally. The negative effect of using too much Faceb...
^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ch Facebook is effecting your emotions. The serious consequence of using Facebook t...
^^^
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...motionless lives on Facebook. To sum up , using Facebook has huge consequences in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, as to, in addition, in particular, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 41.998997996 174% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2983.0 1615.20841683 185% => OK
No of words: 571.0 315.596192385 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22416812609 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84291053758 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499124343257 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 932.4 506.74238477 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 16.0721442886 199% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7466770554 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.21875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.84375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 19.0 3.9879759519 476% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325527804712 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945750456785 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837936545239 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180001853901 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758974471381 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.