Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Agree or Disagree?
It is undeniable that the environment these days has seriously deteriorated due to human activities such as carbon dioxide emissions, industrial agriculture, etc. While I accept that it is governments’ responsibility to alleviate this problem, I believe that individuals should also engage in dealing with the issue.
On the one hand , it is essential that figures of authority should pay attention to protecting and conserving the environment. Firstly, this is attributed to the fact that they have to be responsible for what they have done. For the past decade, many national authorities have imposed policies and initiated new projects that lead to habitat loss. For instance, deforestation has occurred on a global scale, especially in European countries, thus caused extinction of an influx of animal species. The second reason is because of governments' ability to exert significant influences that an ordinary person can not do, such as administering stricter punishments to deter lawbreakers from cutting down trees.
On the other hand, I assume that normal people also play a vital role in mitigating environmental damages. In fact, a minor change in each individual’s lifestyle can produce enormous positive impacts on environment. For instance, many Vietnamese people have embarked on adopting the zero-waste lifestyle and paying more attention to social activities aiming at supporting governments and protecting the natural habitat . In addition, I believe that citizen should have a say in environmental issues since maintaining the environmental sustainability needs a global engagement.
In conclusion, both governments and ordinary citizens should be involved in the environmental conservation as their role is both essential in equal measure While governments can establish progressive policies that reduce environmental damages, individuals can help improve the environment by living a zero-waste lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-13 | heltran2001ha | 78 | view |
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. 61
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. Agree or Disagree? 78
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work. Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology? 78
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- The governments' investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is undeniable that the environment these days has seriously det...
^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...aling with the issue. On the one hand , it is essential that figures of authori...
^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n a global scale, especially in European countries, thus caused extinction of an ...
^^
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...species. The second reason is because of governments ability to exert significant...
^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ments and protecting the natural habitat . In addition, I believe that citizen sho...
^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... role is both essential in equal measure While governments can establish progress...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82456140351 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42661979524 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6915101911 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0833333333 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179332848664 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601801009529 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551662512215 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109949540423 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485110636055 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.