The responsibility for protecting and reducing global environmental damage lies with politicians as there is very little that the individual can do this. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, environment is becoming the hottest and most concerned global issue with many arguments about the responsibility for protecting and reduce environmental damage belonging to the authority or the individual. There is a statement that the politicians are responsible for resolving this problem, meanwhile, the citizens cannot do this. I am opposed to this statement because the environmental issue is just resolved completely with the accompanying of both.
The role of the authorities in protecting the environment is introducing policies preventing non-eco-friendly activities. In many countries, especially in developed ones, governments have a law to limits the emissions from industrial activities. Moreover, they impose “green taxes” on products of many companies and some services such as travelling. Therefore, thanks to these policies, the amount of polluted gases is reduced and stable in the limitation. In addition, government campaigns can raise awareness of individuals about protecting the environment. In general, policies have strong positive effects on settling this big issue.
That is not to say this responsibility only belongs to the politicians, meanwhile, the personal activities also have negative impacts on the environment. The individuals can protect the surroundings through many effective ways. Firstly, people may change their daily habits such as using organic foods replaced for chemical ones, recycling plastic items and using water and electricity economically. Using public transports instead of private ones is also a good way to reduce the emissions that individuals can do. These activities can reduce the amount of polluted substances released per day and preserve natural resources, therefore, play an important role in the environmental protection. Secondly, the consumers can show their roles in not buying any products of companies that are proven not eco-friendly, resulting in these company having to change the way of producing to more friendly with environment. Moreover, citizens may report to the authorities about activities causing pollution near their living areas.
Conclusion, the responsibility for the environmental problems belongs to both the politicians and the individuals. In some cases, individuals do not have permissions enough to resolve problems so the role of government is necessary. That is not to say the government should be blame for totally, instead of that, people should change their habits to more eco-friendly.
- The charts below show the percentage of school-aged boys and girls in secondary school and higher education in four region in the world in 2000. 73
- The bar chars show the number of cars per thousand people in 5 different countries in Europe in 2005, 2009 and 2010 in comparison with the average number. 67
- The bar chart present the percentage of changing cars in 2009 in an European country. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 828, Rule ID: THIS_NNS
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'these companies'?
Suggestion: this company; these companies
...e proven not eco-friendly, resulting in these company having to change the way of producing t...
Line 13, column 278, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO
Message: Did you mean 'blamed'?
... is not to say the government should be blame for totally, instead of that, people sh...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in general, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84010840108 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2935248235 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531165311653 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7160270162 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.421052632 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4210526316 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299991163744 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903142020079 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768480887927 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189016749833 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877205261932 0.056905535591 154% => OK
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.