Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree

Developed countries provide financial help to the under developing countries, however, this cannot help to reduce poverty in those nations. Rich country can provide other helps to enhance their improvement. I completely agree with this given statement.

To begin with, it will be more helpful to give a industry rather than direct money in poor country. To illustrate, people will get job in this company and they economy will be improved due to the income. For example, in Bangladesh, the Canadian government set up a company where more than one thousand people are working. As a result of this, people are getting financially strong and the poverty is being demolished in this country. Furthermore, rich countries can build some universities and colleges so that students of this country can receive education. Education is the backbone of a nation, so if the people get educated they will do a better job in multinational company. Consequently, he personally will be strengthen and the economy will also be helped.

In other words, Developed countries also take some workers from poorer countries and then give them work. America bring thousands of Indian to their country and they are working and sending remittance which making their country stronger. Finally, they also can train some people to make them self-employed and give them some money so that they can invest and bring return.

In a nutshell, the developed countries can support a poor country through various means like building industries, universities, and bring manpower to their country and train people instead of solely giving money.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n with, it will be more helpful to give a industry rather than direct money in po...
^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...king and sending remittance which making their country stronger. Finally, they al...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for example, as a result, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23552123552 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7507315487 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3759171616 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8571428571 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339018963443 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126107730679 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11179445499 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238458914065 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650216776425 0.056905535591 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.