Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
After the second world war, the countries in this world stand together to build their civilization. As a result, the advanced nations give the charity to the poorer countries. Billions of dollars have been distributed to those states, but the result is insignificant. Some people believe contend that the other kinds of aid such as transferring technologies and helping in educations are better. In my perception, financial aid is useless to eradicate the poverty comprehensively.
the corruption case in poorer nations is high. When they obtain money from financial aid, the government will take it for themselves. Frequently, the money which should be used to eradicate poverty, such as building schools, constructing the roads and improving the public amenities is not fit with the plan that the rich countries expect. The wealthy nations just acquire the fake report about the use of their aid. In the long-term consequences, both of those countries do not make any progress to solve poverty.
Transferring knowledge is the best way to fix this problem. As we know that, knowledge is power, and it can improve the human and countries relatively. For example, if the rich nations provide the free education to the younger generation in poorer countries to study abroad, they will follow the path of advanced nations how to manage states and society. Additionally, the developed countries are able to teach and give some courses how to harness technologies. For instance, people having been obtaining the understanding about technologies will be able to pioneers in their homelands to solve their problems and utilize the local sources like how to use sunlight as electrical resources and how to purify water with the limited tools.
To sum up, giving the free education and providing technologies are likely to take on long effect and high possibilities to fix poverty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...adicate the poverty comprehensively. the corruption case in poorer nations is hi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21122112211 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94228078141 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2430111912 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254982453697 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774970330264 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553157154436 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140759669092 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600604668221 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.