Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need a dumb worker more do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, many developed countries need more workers at a low cost salaries, which increase their profits. While some people thought that these countries should not hire skilled employees from developing countries because their countries need more workers than rich countries, other people not agree with these people. This essay will discuss why some people think it is not a good and why remaining people not agree with the given argument, all the explanation described in the following paragraphs.
To embark with, if big multinational companies hire people from poor nations, which will lead towards higher unemployment rate their native countries. Google for example, hired over 70,000 humans in their smartphone factory in the USA in 2020, as a result of it Over 50% of US citizens who were highest paid employees ended with jobless in the USA. Therefore, these types of evidence prove that hiring skill full workers at low cost will improve the company’s profit, but it creates many unexpected challenges for countries’ perspective. Ultimately, since when the companies hired many employees at a lower amount of salary, which increases unemployment ratios.
On the other hand, there are number of people who think that hiring cheap skilled people, which will help in the development in their countries. Nowadays, many countries allowed to poor people from another nations, which will help in our economical growth and to create a relationship between two countries. For example, the Indian government started to hire 10 percentage of posts in the railway's sector from poor countries after that policy, there are citizens of nine countries worked in India and their relations with India become stronger than ever before. Indeed, hiring employees from low established countries, which always beneficial for both countries otherwise, it is not possible when we do not hire these types of persons regardless of their citizenships.
To conclude, although assigning better-qualified employees from the poor city is not good for the country, their benefits are higher than the problem. Despite of allowing chances to poor people form poor nations, it will be create a positive development at the international level for the nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-03 | rajpatel90 | 73 | view |
- The chart show fresh fruit exports in 2010 67
- For schoolchildren their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014 78
- The maps shows changes in frenton city during 1992 to 2012 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their countries need more workers than rich countries, other people not agree w...
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...another nations, which will help in our economical growth and to create a relationship bet...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...d to hire 10 percentage of posts in the railways sector from poor countries after that p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35211267606 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75529246724 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529577464789 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.763512022 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.153846154 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269160830574 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106911640277 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958647333761 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174672134632 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809724695929 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.