Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only after practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. Agree or disagree?
Education is fundamental right of a child. It leads to a individual progress. Some people argue that, subjects like philosophy and history should not be taught in universities because there are less chances of growth in such fields. I completely disagree with this. I believe that every course has its own value, hence they should be taught in the universities.
To begin with, not everyone can pursue practical degree because not everyone has the same level of intellect. Most of the people find it difficult to study practical courses. The caliber of every individual is not same. It is true that practical courses like science, finance have more job opportunities but this does not imply that universities should stop teaching arts subjects. There are pretty much chances for growth in subjects like philosophy, history, political science etc. it depends how an individual seek for different growth opportunities.
In subject, like philosophy people become more logical thinkers which make them better decision makers. This knowledge is beneficial for them at individual as well as macro level. Economy needs logical thinkers to make right decisions. Practical knowledge along with philosophical knowledge is best combination and if one can have both of them, then he must pursue that. For instance, most of the companies hire philosophy students to recruit people in their organization, as they can choose right kind of people for their company.
To conclude, I second with the fact that every subject should be taught in universities because not everyone has interest in practical subjects. Combination of both is required for higher growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ndamental right of a child. It leads to a individual progress. Some people argue ...
^
Line 2, column 56, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'individual progress'.
Suggestion: individual progress
...ndamental right of a child. It leads to a individual progress. Some people argue that, subjects like ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...aught in universities because there are less chances of growth in such fields. I com...
^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...eaching arts subjects. There are pretty much chances for growth in subjects like phi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...edge along with philosophical knowledge is best combination and if one can have both of...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 492, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
... their organization, as they can choose right kind of people for their company. To c...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of both is required for higher growth.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, then, well, for instance, kind of, as well as, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3358778626 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82452032032 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.874821937 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5555555556 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258637254078 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682108499308 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728900880865 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160101552693 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414035862564 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.