Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach art subject like philosophy and history and only other practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To what extend do you agree or disagree ?
Education being a precursor of bright future need to be job specific, according to some because the hefty university fees as well as limited job offers made it mandatory these days to opt for professional degrees rather than art courses. In my opinion, I agree that students of modern generation need to be smart enough to put their scarce resources in professional programs.
First and foremost, unemployment is indeed a worldwide concern which has been risen lately, therefore the universities should encourage the students towards career oriented courses such as nursing, engineering, accounting and so on, as a result, increasing the skilled pool of our national youth generation. Moreover, these programs also provide indispensable outcomes at considerable scale in the field of education and healthcare which are the two basic amenities of people living in our society. Therefore, according to me, universities should focus more on imparting professional education instead of non professional. Secondly, on the contrary, programs like philosophy and history does not hold significant value in our day to day life and also work related to these fields are not paid well internationally. Consequently, it is certain that the students valuable money and time would go in vain if they pursued their education in such areas. In addition to that they might also end up sitting idle at home without getting their dream job.
Nevertheless, students should not be enforced to make their career decisions on the benchmarks of job security and higher wages as education is a process of learning as well as enhancing one's skills in streams of their personal choices of educational careers. Philosophy as well as other art courses should be delivered by the universities for those who are not academically brilliant and needed to be enrolled in simple programs like arts along with that it is the keen interest of an individual students who desired to be a great philosopher rather than to be well qualified doctor in foreseeable future. It is the need of the hour that universities should provide a wide range of courses to aspiring students irrespective of their academic cost and employment probability in near future.
To recapitulate, admittedly the shortage of economic funds and job opportunities are crucial elements while making the decision for academic courses. The students, however, must follow their hearts as nothing goes in waste when done wholeheartedly.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-03-21 | Simran Sidhu | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...rocess of learning as well as enhancing ones skills in streams of their personal cho...
^^^^
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...t is the keen interest of an individual students who desired to be a great philosopher r...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2951653944 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06439720131 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580152671756 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7216953583 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.076923077 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2307692308 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.2307692308 7.06120827912 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157532578074 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507801581133 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470709723109 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0863839492875 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043812446514 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.