Science will soon make people live up 100 or even 200 years Some believe that this is a good thing while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
By developing technology in the last decads on the medical aspect, the people can live more 100 years. Besides, science prevents them from illness and significant issues like a heart attack. However, a few people are opposed to prolonged life, which is rooted in a religious perspective. From my point of view, there is some factor, which should be considered by scientists for improving a more comfortable life. This essay attends to examine this controversial issue.
In the first step, some people have an attitude based on having long term life. Medical society struggles to help people to be healthy by the state of the art drug or vaccine. The way of explanation, the medical centers are exposed to produce an annual vaccine to solve some global pandemic around the world. In particular, the COVID-19, which is spread out by some animals, is a hazardous virus that can kill people's gray population. Moreover, Due to Genetic mutations, the range of people under dangerous circumstances should be sustained by a new vaccine.in this case, life can play an essential role for us. Inconsequent, the advancement of the medical aspect are acted as a vital element for having at least 100 years of living.
Additionally, some religious opinions have a negative attitude to cross with scientific long-life. In general, this vision of people is against scientific society. Besides, they believe that God defines the period time of life for humankind. In Iran, to illustrate, the religious people say that in Islam, the supernatural rule can determine the age of people. Notably, the ones whom people respect as a leader say that the age of people is to belong by prying and reading Quran. Nonetheless, a long-distance between religious practice and the people can exert a negative impact on life. So it seems that the psychological vision can prove this kind of idea.
Finally, in my idea, the progress in science for long term life should be limited by some rules. It should be considered that a crucial balance should regulate a few plans for controlling dense populations and the rate of death and breeding. For example, the energy resources are limited by specific of the people are staying in some area. The novel research has shown that the vast number of energy sources in the west of Europe is ended until 2050. To address this problem, the rate of death and breeding should be controlled by governments worldwide. As a result, having an essential balance for keeping the natural resource depends on the role can restrict the lives of the people.
In conclusion, the advantage of scientific advancement has a long life for people, but some religious ones fight against this medical benefit. Besides, from my perspective, we should adopt a pivotal role to avoid the increasing population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-20 | amir_gha67 | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | amir_gha67 | 73 | view |
- Modern cultures around the world have become similar as compared to the past What are the main reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 78
- If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course,which professor will you choose? The one you used to sign up for courses or the oneyou have never learned from before? 61
- how do you think movies and televisions can influence the behavior of ordinary people? give a specefic reasons and examples to support your idea. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends? 60
- Today many people prefer to manage a business on their own and work independently There are several reasons according to this attitude as well as some drawbacks that it may bring for the owners In this essay these reasons and minus points will be mentione 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal aspect, the people can live more 100 years. Besides, science prevents them fr...
^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...les to help people to be healthy by the state of the art drug or vaccine. The way of explanation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01287553648 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710344701 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512875536481 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 16.0 2.52805611222 633% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.552950337 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138196824085 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426510482682 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235143712208 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822004947826 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300561260048 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal aspect, the people can live more 100 years. Besides, science prevents them fr...
^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...les to help people to be healthy by the state of the art drug or vaccine. The way of explanation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2336.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01287553648 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78710344701 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512875536481 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 742.5 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 16.0 2.52805611222 633% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.552950337 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8461538462 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.96153846154 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138196824085 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426510482682 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235143712208 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822004947826 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300561260048 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.