While there are thousands of languages being spoken around the world these days, it is said that only one common language will exist as a means of communication in the future. In my opinion, despite some positive impacts this development might have, its negative sides are much more considerable.
On the one hand, the emergence of a global language can give humanity several benefits. One evident benefit is that with the language barriers removed, business will achieve greater efficiency since its progress is more time-saving and cost-effective. The economy of a country will, therefore, develop faster, which is associated with the improvement in human life quality. Another advantage is students can have better opportunities getting access to new knowledge from other countries and apply it into their real lives, which will help foster the development of the third-world countries. For example, if Vietnamese people can get technological advances of Japan like technology of road construction, they can easily address several issues about traffic and transportation in Vietnam.
On the other hand, the adoption of a universal language also triggers many problems. In fact, apart from being a communicating tool, a language represents its users’ culture as well as tradition and history of the country where it is spoken. When current languages are replaced by a unique international one, chances are a country’s core identity like culture will disappear. Also, many languages carry a unique story or even a lesson in the past which is closely connected to religion, beliefs and lifestyles. Using only one language may, consequently, makes human being suffer from the loss of cultural diversity and historical values, and eventually leads human life to boredom with the disappearance of these aspects.
In conclusion, although an international language could better the world in some aspects, it is likely to do more harm than good to human life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, third, well, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98580403259 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7271190345 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191561613026 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698139605297 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374150831514 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12052505767 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300878018798 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.