Scientists have found the environmental problems are still serious because many people have not changed their lifestyle.
Why do they refuse to change their lifestyle and how do we encourage them to?
Scientists believe that environmental problems are posing serious threats to today’s world because of people’s unchanged lifestyle. This essay discusses the reasons why they do not have any lifestyle changes and also suggest how to give encouragement to them.
One of the major reasons associated with this is that at the moment environmental issues does not take any considerable negative impact in their daily life. This is because people cannot see how global warming is destroying the environment or resource depletion affects our life. They just consider enviromental concerns when flooding or soil erosion happens. Another worrying reason is that many people do not fully understand the environmental problems that we are facing. To illustrate, despite the fact that greater investment in public transport would keep more cars off the roads, they usually choose to use their private transportation. Therefore, there are many explanations for most people’s unchanged lifestyle.
On the other hand, one solution to this is for governments or large environmental organisations to take serious steps to tackle these problems by frequent meetings to discuss it. Besides, they sould organise enviromental conservation events in order to call on people. In other words, another possible solution to this problem would be for individuals to help in various ways. They should recycle more, plant more trees in their gardens or public areas, or they are able to restrict to using nonrenewable resources. Thus, when facing many serious threats from environmental issues, cooperations and individuals need to look for more effective solutions to preserve our planet by changing our lifestyles.
In conclusion, in my opinion, changes individuals’ lifestyles and large organisations’ supports can resolve partly these problems when people still play an important role in diverse aspects of the Earth’s well-being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-22 | nghiemngoc | 61 | view |
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 67
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 73
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectoures in Canada in 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows causes of injuries in Australia for teenagers and the general population 75
- Students should pay the full cost of their own university studies rather than have free higher education provided by the state 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... our planet by changing our lifestyles. In conclusion, in my opinion, changes in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, look, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63103448276 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08019062986 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9689404505 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352330922514 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103177962864 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895305725028 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218083368066 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122387726565 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.