Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Computers plays a vital role in our day-to-day life including car driving says by some scientist. Recently road accidents are significantly increasing as compared to past years. So that scientist might think that, which could be reduced by the accumulation of computers in driving seats. However, in my opinion which would be the negative impact on the society than the betterment. Because, computers are just as a machine controlled by the software which installed.
On the one hand, many experts believe that computer application in cars would likely to have a good experience in someone those who are new in certain areas to reach an appropriate destination by the help of installed software. In other words, peoples would have consume the time and tide by asking destination to someone around the road. Moreover, such innovations would help the elderly people, non licensed drivers, even children's to go somewhere without disturbing others also might have a chance of such prediction by scientist.
Nevertheless, owing to the fact that computers are just machines, which could not think, lack of problem solving skills other than proper installation, would most likely to have a serious side effects to the society. Driving is not only a skill of someone but also a critical thinking, ability to handle some particular situations like, accidents and so on. The computers might help us to reach the accurate place which we need to go, while, they could not help others those who wants a lift or help in some emergencies. In addition, any mistake or errors from the software would make a more accidents on to the passengers and pedestrians as well.
In conclusion, my perception of future cars operated by a computers would make a negative impact rather than positive development. Flexibility and safety of everyone should be controlled by a human mind is more safe than by a machine or computer help in future too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur day-to-day life including car driving says by some scientist. Recently road ac...
^^
Line 1, column 384, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...act on the society than the betterment. Because, computers are just as a machine contro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'consumed'.
Suggestion: consumed
...are. In other words, peoples would have consume the time and tide by asking destination...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rbing others also might have a chance of such prediction by scientist. Neverth...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ould most likely to have a serious side effects to the society. Driving is not only a s...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a computer' or simply 'computers'?
Suggestion: a computer; computers
...y perception of future cars operated by a computers would make a negative impact rather tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05974842767 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83999175742 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553459119497 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.016246022 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115905772315 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426153942451 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467964658895 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801577858257 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488746074779 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.