Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language. Do you think the advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the question of whether a global language should be adopted or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this idea is not without advantages, the downsides will overshadow.
On the one hand, there are some certain advantages if humans spoke the sole language. First, since a global language facilitates communication between people, it will allow many countries to bolster economic growth. In fact, Singapore could be a salient example of this situation as it is a nation where English is considered as the first language, which opens avenues for foreign investment to penetrate into Singapore’s market thanks to a flexible business transaction. Second, by boosting language homogeneity, people may have more opportunities to enrich their knowledge. This means that all the documents will be transferred to one language, which helps people have a full grasp of many fields such as science or math.
On the other hand, there are an array of disadvantages of adopting a global language for every country. First, if people spoke one language only, they may leave the cultural diversities at stake. In fact, each country has its own way of life as well as norms that are embedded in their language, thus creating a special feature of a country’s culture. Second, in order to keep the national identity, having mother tongue is necessary. For example, Hong Kong, the country where people speak Cantonese, has fought many years to not to be assimilated into China, which is an indication that they have not allowed Mandarin to be spoken in their country.
In conclusion, although the idea of adopting a global language appears attractive, the drawbacks will be far more significant. By considering all the pros and cons of speaking a sole language, humans can make the best decision for themselves down the road.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
Nowadays, the question of whether a global language should be adopted or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'arrays'?
Suggestion: arrays
... math. On the other hand, there are an array of disadvantages of adopting a global l...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12582781457 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85465801964 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5994157306 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.571428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139525398967 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525160978172 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382063196354 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937116855545 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286634187402 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.