Scientists use living animals to carry out research. Some people think it is interesting, while some others think it is cruel. What is your opinion ?
Animal experimentation has long been the subject of heated debate. It is true that scientists often test medicines on living animals before coming to human’s use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that those experiments are morally wrong, I am in the support of reducing the amount of animals used in medical research.
On the one hand, the lives of all creatures on earth should be respected. Some medicines, when in testing, may consist of a large proportion that, if the project fails, can kill the animals. Opponents of such research argue that human have no right to make animals suffer to this kind of trauma. Every animal deserves a needing care that equalized to human and scientists will have to join in the adventure of finding alternative methods of experimentation.
On the other hand, there are not always reliable and available alternatives for research on living animals. Basically, we would feel abnormal if one of the members in our family must use the medicine that hasn’t gone through testing. Upholding the thought that using animals to carry out research is cruel, however, some people agree that a small amount of suffering on the body of a rat can be worthy if it saves a human life. Personally, I agree on banning using animals for non-medical experimentation. Besides, I still feel it is a necessary evil if useful drugs and medical procedures are concerned.
In conclusion, lessening the number of animals using for research is crucial, if there is still no alternatives for such phenomenon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, may, so, still, while, in conclusion, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03921568627 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93052712578 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8190719751 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8461538462 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263709417693 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842837571971 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582320836097 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148512022895 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547711513056 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.