Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
These days, the question of whether authorities should invest in rare language or not has been receiving a great deal of public attention. Although this project seems to be a waste of money, the benefits would be far more significant.
There are several reasons why saving these languages is not imperative. First, since these languages are spoken by minimal numbers of people, they are not ubiquitous. In fact, in the industrialized world like in the present, citizens should only learn necessary languages such as English or Japanese as countries using those languages have dominated job markets, which creates better employment possibilities. Second, by allocating to those minority languages, governments would not have enough money for other more important concerns. For instance, students could not be well-trained and well-educated as schools lack teaching and learning facilities or the demand for the healthcare of people could not be accommodated due to the shortage of medical services. Therefore, national prosperity may not be achieved.
Others are in favor of the idea that preserving languages that are on the verge of extinction is of great benefit to citizens and the entire nation also. First, as plenty of researchers suggest that languages were born through daily activities in the past such as singing, saving languages means saving cultures. In fact, the maintenance of languages opens a window to different interesting cultures, which helps people to expand more knowledge about the world. Also, in order to save a language, some feasible solutions could be done with a small amount of money to invest in. For example, schools could introduce language classes to students and encourage them to take those causes with some discounts, which could trigger their curiosity and offer employment to native speakers who become teachers.
In conclusion, this trend supposes to bring further advantages. With careful consideration, governments can make better solutions to save languages which are knowledge sources of humans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
These days, the question of whether authorities should invest in rare langu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...nefit to citizens and the entire nation also. First, as plenty of researchers sugges...
^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'languages'' or 'language's'?
Suggestion: languages'; language's
...ies in the past such as singing, saving languages means saving cultures. In fact, the mai...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44794952681 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89220261258 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9266975056 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.133333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335071462269 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104686886835 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529679625533 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185930936982 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647424157036 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.