should we tell the mistakes to teachers and when should we tell them
Currently, the community has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus citizens become more proficient in critical thinking and they are not fully convinced of the knowledge or information imparted in classes or meetings, which triggers a heated discussion that when there comes a mistake committed during a class or a meeting, should we correct the mistakes and when should we express our different notions. A bunch of individuals reckon that they are inclined to say nothing about it since they think that this kind of behaviors is not abiding by etiquettes and get teachers or leaders annoyed. While others contend that they probably interrupt and correct the mistake once it occurs. However, from my own perspective, I harbor the idea that we ought to point out the mistakes when the class or meeting is over for the reasons as follows.
To start with, pinpointing the mistakes committed in the meeting or class enables both the individuals delivering speeches and listeners to have a grasp of truth or better comprehension. For individuals who give speeches, provided that they impart wrong information without being informed of their mistakes, they are likely to commit the same mistakes, which misguides more listeners. With regard to listeners, since they tend to regard teachers or meeting leaders as the dominant authorities, they may follow those leaders or teachers blindly owing to the dearth of independent thinking, therefore the synonymous mistakes will emerge in future time, which leads to the degradation of cultural achievement. If the mistakes can be pinpointed by us, not only can we possess the truth or profound knowledge, but also ensure that no more individuals will be misguided by wrong information. However, a myriad of individuals, for the sake of the fear of annoying teachers or meeting leaders, opt for not telling the mistakes, personally speaking, provided that we behave complying with the rudimentary principles about courtesy, most teachers and leaders are open-minded enough to adopt our suggestions and even feel enlightened since we attach ample attention to their speeches.
What's more, pointing out the mistakes after classes or meetings is the optimal approach. Initially, instead of pinpointing the mistakes teachers or leaders make during the process of giving speeches, pointing out problems after class or meeting shows our respect for their efforts. To be more specific, it is not courteous for us to interrupt them, which probably delays the procession of delivering significant contents. Apart from that, it is more acceptable for teachers and leaders to admit their mistakes. Sometimes, owing to their dignity as authoritative entities, they feel embarrassed or humiliated to admit their mistakes in front of a large number of audiences, or there is a probability that they fail to act quickly to recognize their blunders, which gives rise to some avoidable misinterpretation or quarrels. Hence, pointing out mistakes after classes or meetings contributes to our decorum and their realization of their faults.
Admittedly, some teachers and leaders feel irritated by our behaviors of correcting mistakes, nevertheless, if we act appropriately to demonstrate our etiquettes, most of them feel glad to receive feedback from their listeners and socialize with us.
In a nutshell, from what has been mentioned above, when there comes a mistake committed by teachers or meeting leaders in front of lots of listeners, the favored alternative is pointing out the blunders after classes or meetings since for one thing, it enables us to have a better understanding of the imparted information, for another, it shows our reverence for people delivering speeches and renders them adequate time to figure out the problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | lauren123z | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Davronova Dilnoza Damirovna | 56 | view |
- Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:It it better to spend money on travelling and vacation than save money for the future. 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Physical exercise is more important to older people than to younger people 80
- venus is an inhospitable place for we human being to live permanently 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ach ample attention to their speeches. Whats more, pointing out the mistakes after c...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ted to admit their mistakes in front of a large number of audiences, or there is a probability th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, apart from, kind of, for one thing, to start with, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 10.4138276553 317% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 61.0 24.0651302605 253% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 41.998997996 202% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3197.0 1615.20841683 198% => OK
No of words: 597.0 315.596192385 189% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35510887772 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.20363070211 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98805311239 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 284.0 176.041082164 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475711892797 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 979.2 506.74238477 193% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.779463579 49.4020404114 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 188.058823529 106.682146367 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1176470588 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230180236362 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714758770029 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646779276407 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127273870988 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695814725364 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.0946893788 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.4 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 78.4519038076 199% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.5 9.78957915832 291% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 10.7795591182 269% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.