Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

Essay topics:

Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?

A deliberation has begun and people are torn in an argument involving the developed and underdeveloped nations. Some say that those wealthy nations must provide necessities to those in need. However, others believe that the responsibility for the basic needs of people must be in the hands of those who govern them. As of the moment, where prominence of droughs, hunger, war and crime arise, many viewpoints were seen, especially from international organizations such as the United Nations. Leaders of different countries as well as celebrities have joined in the debate. Let me show some examples to you.

It is not new to our ears to know how wars arise in the middle east. Yet it extent to this day have become unbereable to our eyes. Seeing a people of all ages suffer and see escape in two ways, the first one is by migrating to other country, second, is to die, is really heartbreaking. Different presidents have considered taking in refugees such as France, Germany, Canada and United States. They have provided a feeling of safety for them but as to the extent of help they can be willing to give remains to be still questionable up to this day.

Calamities and natural and sometimes man-made disasters that usually happen within the scope of our nature. Many of these are most common in the Philippines. Typhoons are common in this country because it is surrounded by oceans. During these times, many neighboring countries even the developed ones in the northern part of the glove join forces in helping the victims in monetary and goods. This led to minimal action taken by the government itself though they are known to have been in rich in natural resources that could also be means in helping their countryman. The most known calamity yet, is the typhoon Yolanda that hit the Western Visayas in 2013. Billions in peso currency have been collected. However, the results expected with the said donations is not, sadly what has happened up to this day. Issues came up including mishandling of funds, corruption, embezzlement involving the higher ups of the Philippine governments.

All in all, the said facts only show us that the success and failure of helping another nation still lies in the management of the Government where they belong. We can and we will if we really want it to happen. One can only co-depend. Too much reliance in other countries resources will promote stagnation to your own. I think it is still much better to try to give what you can. Take note of what you cannot and maximize of the excess for better management and productivity thus lessening the dependency and misuse of help.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, still, thus, well, as to, i think, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 450.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83777777778 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69028889173 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564444444444 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.905176228 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7307692308 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3076923077 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862347634045 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0183350497218 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361938005521 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0502670272176 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269423180827 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.