Small businesses should avoid recruiting young women who do not have their own family in order to avoid paying maternity leave later on. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that small companies ought to avoid hiring young females who do not have marrying yet, this trend can help them avoid paying for pregnancy leave in the future. In my view, I absolutely disagree with this idea owing to three main reasons that I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, I would disagree that some firms do not employ unmarried women because it leads to a form of discrimination. In modern society, for example, males and females are gender equality, and they have an opportunity in terms of seeking job positions are the same. Therefore, if some businesses hire young people based on whether they have their own family or not, then they can be sued because of causing gender inequality in society.
Secondly, some laws in the world protect the right of women. Take Poland as an example, some companies can be penalized, if they tend to hire a person that is based on their gender rather than their educational backgrounds or their experiences. As a result, this trend can create lots of chances for women to find a job.
Finally, small companies can be lost a big loss if they do not recruit young females who do not have their own family. Another good example of this is that some women are genius such as Sabrina Pasterski from Chicago in America, she is a genius about physical, and she has created a fight when she was 14. Therefore, this phenomenon could lead to lacking the employees who have qualifications in the future.
For the reasons mentioned above, I totally reject the view that small companies avoid hiring young females who do not have a private family to avoid paying a part of the financing for the pregnancy leave of women in the future.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for example, such as, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69127516779 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48963438215 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51677852349 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3054517282 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298765305061 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111249838014 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10568354298 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182090665642 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776784014132 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.