Smoking is not only harm the smoker, but also those who nearby. Therefore, smoking should be baned in public places. To what extent do you agre or disagree?
Smoking has inevitably been a concern of governments around the globe considering how to manage and educate smoking people. This is due largely to the danger of the substance contained in the cigarettes, nicotine. As its drawback may also occur for the people near the smokers, policies related to this, particularly in public places, should be taken into account; whether it should be banned or not.
I personally think that forbidding such dangerous activity will be much beneficial that it can prevent others from having a vulnerable respiratory system. Moreover, this can maintain the places so clean that people could always find them fascinating with less air pollution. However, governments should consciously provide some special places which, in this case, can be used for smoking.
On the other hand, people who have currently been addicted to smoke would feel hard to avoid smoking in such places. As a result, they may smoke breaking the rule and not even feeling guilty. For this reason, there are two steps then to encounter this probable emerging problem. First, some strict law and appropriate punishment such as to pay more tax or to give any charity orphans or others needing. Second, education is one of the most prominent and essential way to change peoples’ belief in terms of having their cigarette burnt.
However, banning such activity in public places is not merely a way to prevent others from the harms of smokes, but it will, to a larger extent, possibly be able to elevate people’s awareness of how dangerous smoking is.
To sum up, despite being a hard thing for smokers to not smoke, the policy which bans smoking in public places should be applied in order to safe others. Nonetheless, people’s education in terms of the drawbacks of smoking is a part from this aim.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'as to', 'such as', 'as a result', 'to sum up', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221264367816 0.247107183377 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.169540229885 0.155533422707 109% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0833333333333 0.0946595960268 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0632183908046 0.0501214627716 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229885057471 0.0437548338989 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10632183908 0.122226691241 87% => OK
Participles: 0.066091954023 0.0403226058552 164% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.67684871746 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0431034482759 0.0326793684256 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00287356321839 0.00163938923432 175% => OK
Determiners: 0.0862068965517 0.0861772015684 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0373563218391 0.021408717616 174% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014367816092 0.011925033212 120% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1819.0 1933.35771543 94% => OK
No of words: 302.0 316.048096192 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.02317880795 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397350993377 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.284768211921 0.28420135186 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.172185430464 0.203846283523 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115894039735 0.137316102897 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67684871746 2.80594681477 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615894039735 0.56093040696 110% => OK
Word variations: 70.0957970114 60.7387585426 115% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.5714285714 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4197712747 49.517814964 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.928571429 127.492653851 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7743622355 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07142857143 0.814263465372 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 50.0482497635 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.5393258427 1.69124875643 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33257369799 0.332605444948 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0963346641938 0.102741220458 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650754019261 0.0668466124924 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.560684832141 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.164575140632 0.148594505496 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130230585822 0.134430193775 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817514763581 0.0742795772207 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.246594857549 0.324371583561 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112526041868 0.0638462369009 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223343375045 0.228012699653 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697009682269 0.058150111329 120% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.68436873747 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 5.90881763527 85% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.