Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Cigarette's smoke has toxic effects in those who inhale it, thus a large section of society reckons that the government should prohibited smoking in social areas and buildings. From my point of view, people should only be able to smoke in open spaces and in private buildings.
The smoker's decision to be unhealthy should not mean that the people surrounding him must suffer the consequences of this harming habit. Multiple studies have proved that smoking can multiply the possibilities of suffering different kind of diseases, such as lung cancer. In addition, during the last decades, it has been discovered that the smoke generated by a lighten cigarette can have similar results in the people located around it. While gases are constantly flowing in open spaces, the gas concentration remains the same in closed rooms. Thus, people must not smoke inside.
However, banning smoking in open public areas could crossed a dangerous line regarding smokers' anxiety and freedom. As mentioned above, the effects of cigarette smoke on people close to it can be quite harmful, and if an open space is too crowed, it may have the same consequences. Nevertheless, should smoking be banned in this type of places, then people could probably only smoke on a daily basis when they got home. As a result, smokers would spend most of their day, especially at stressful situations, anxious and in a bad mood.
To conclude, I partly agree with the statement. While not smokers should never have to deal with health issues due to the poor decisions of a smoker, addiction to nicotine can cause high level of stress, which could end up a smoker's job or relationship if he's not able to smoke for hours. Therefore, in my opinion, smoking in open public spaces must be permitted.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... discovered that the smoke generated by a lighten cigarette can have similar results in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in closed rooms. Thus, people must not smoke inside. However, banning smokin...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cross'
Suggestion: cross
...ning smoking in open public areas could crossed a dangerous line regarding smokers anxi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...h level of stress, which could end up a smokers job or relationship if hes not able to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...end up a smokers job or relationship if hes not able to smoke for hours. Therefore,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95622895623 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6290885254 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5567846245 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304145911635 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107284832261 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627445502255 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195958292227 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425011888404 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... discovered that the smoke generated by a lighten cigarette can have similar results in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 568, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in closed rooms. Thus, people must not smoke inside. However, banning smokin...
^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'cross'
Suggestion: cross
...ning smoking in open public areas could crossed a dangerous line regarding smokers anxi...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'smokers'' or 'smoker's'?
Suggestion: smokers'; smoker's
...h level of stress, which could end up a smokers job or relationship if hes not able to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
...end up a smokers job or relationship if hes not able to smoke for hours. Therefore,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, while, as to, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95622895623 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6290885254 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599326599327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5567846245 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304145911635 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107284832261 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627445502255 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195958292227 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425011888404 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.