Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree?
Environment deterioration is one of the great concerns to the survival and development of humankind in the dawn of the third minllenium. It is believed that the responsibility to deal with environmental problems should be shouldered by one international establishment. I somewhat disagree with this view as international coordination alone can not cope with the issue as it requires the knowledge of local conditions, which may only be acknowledged by individual governments, albeit it is advantageous for the organization to a certain extent.
It is more difficult for international environmental organizations to solve negative environmental implications than governments. The hardship stems from the shortage of knowledge covering local geography, culture, and even religious belief. This disables the international establishment to deliver instant assistance when needed. By contrast, national governments are more capable of processing environmental problems. Apart from an understanding of local cultures, the local authorities are equipped with legislations and forces, which are more effective to deter reckless acts against as well as conserve the environment. Therefore, governments have more tools at their disposal to protect the environment, while their international counterpart is burdened with a lack of local understanding.
Admittedly, there are merits associated with the interference of international cooperation in preserving the earth's equilibrium. One of the advantages is the ability to call into mutual actions of nations. This multiplies the effects of strategies utilized for curbing global warming, climate change, or reducing carbon footprint. However, the approach can not be harnessed without the support of single governments, which still holding key to the success of such campaigns.
In sum, I mostly disagree with the perception that only one international organization can resolve challenges of the environmental degradation. While the organization can rally support internationally, they lack the comprehension of factors relate to specific areas as opposed to local governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...rnational cooperation in preserving the earths equilibrium. One of the advantages is t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, third, well, while, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0297029703 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.641907836 2.80592935109 130% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6997088274 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.8 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260832581836 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882418227577 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09152545494 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146954174896 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607130530171 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.