Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
It is the case that lots of children spend hours on smartphones daily, which may result from several factors and can be considered disadvantageous from my perspective.
Among the elements contributing to the lengthy daily engagement of children with smartphones is the penetration of technology into human social life, which is an objective circumstance of society. With the fast-paced renovation of technological advances, electronic devices are playing a more and more crucial role in people's life, replacing several manual activities with automatic or computer-used ones, so it is understandable for children to access technology devices, including smartphones, from a young age. Furthermore, many 21st-century parents appear to lack quality time with their children. Some may focus so much on their career that they give their kids a phone and let them do whatever they want with that electronic device to do their work wholeheartedly. Others are willing to fulfil their children's demand to use their phones without the mere thought that smartphones can be harmful. This reality gradually leads to kids' using smartphones for a long time every day.
Allowing children to spend much time in a day using smartphones can be detrimental, in my opinion, in two main ways. The foremost apparent facet influenced by phones is human health. Prolonged screen time can lead to poor posture, eye strain and a lack of physical activity, contributing to obesity and decreased cardiovascular healthiness. Regarding human mental health, excessive smartphone use can disrupt people's sleep and impact their memory, which reduces their cognitive and learning skills. Another factor that prolonged smartphone use can affect is human social life and social skills. Smartphones have made social networking websites more accessible but have also impacted how our youth interact in real life since they find it easy to make friends online and converse with them via messaging. Youngsters' dependency on phones, to put it another way, has reduced their ability to talk with others in person. Also, excessive smartphone use may allow false idolization, social media addiction and cyberbullying to arise uncontrollably, worsening people's performances at school and work and even putting their lives at risk.
In conclusion, there are reasons why children spend hours and hours on smartphones every day, and this trend, I believe, yields drawbacks rather than any benefits that can be noticed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45430809399 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00839039655 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590078328982 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5780754409 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5625 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9375 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252816951879 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857428860528 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797826014865 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183613571593 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794088609407 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.7795591182 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.