Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
It is sometimes argued that children are spending the majority of their day with eyes glued to their smartphones. There are quite a few factors contributing to this phenomenon, and personally I consider this a negative trend.
First and foremost, there are various reasons attributing to this particular notion. Primarily, children are using their phones as a form of entertainment. This could be further explained by the fact that smartphones are now providing human society with a wide range of entertainment options, ranging from mobile games to social media and streaming platforms. As a result, children tend to be drawn to these activities mainly for leisure as well as to connect with friends. Another noteworthy aspect lies in the fact that many children are choosing to spend time on their smartphones as a way to escape from reality or a coping mechanism. This is mainly because of a lack of other activities which children could utilize to deal with stress, boredom and other negative emotions. Consequently, youngsters tend to distract themselves by the means of digital content available through their phones.
Nevertheless, despite all the causes mentioned above, I maintain the opinion that this tendency will adversely affect children for two main reasons. Firstly, excess screen time will have a profoundly unfavorable effect on children’s academic performance. This is because if children are spending a disproportionate amount of time on their phones, it will cause a distraction from participation in school, along with reducing the attention span and time on academic tasks and homework. As a reasonable result, this will be pessimistically reflected in their exam grades. Another point worth mentioning is the possibility of being addicted to smartphones. This could be clarified by the fact that the more time spent on their phones, the less able the children will be to control the total amount of screen time without absentmindedly reaching for their phones as a habit. Correspondingly, this action will eventually result in the neglect of other responsibilities, including their own wellbeing and as part of society, similar to the case of a drug addict.
In conclusion, there is a wide range of factors involved in the excessive screen time of children. I personally believe that this trend will affect negatively not only children’s wellbeing and mental health but also their over academic performance. It is crucial that parents, educators and caregivers should implement appropriate measures to safeguard children’s wellbeing and to counteract the potential negative impacts of this phenomenon.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 412.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40776699029 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13643327468 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526699029126 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 681.3 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8430027129 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.263157895 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6842105263 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289364737887 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972900818946 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508395013277 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208613064808 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411703538155 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.