These days we are witness to residents having the freedom to build and design their houses and office buildings because there are not enough government restrictions on how it should be done. I believe that, although there are advantages, imposing few government monitors can lead to environmental damage and other problems.
One of the main benefits of allowing architectures and engineers to design their construction without government control is the scope of creativity. This allows the designer to be more open in new ideas and materials, which may lead to innovation and uniqueness in constructions. Another benefit is that the project which has not been controlled by the government can fulfill personal preference to demonstrate their perspective. By imposing a few control on the construction industry, we might have different buildings that vary from person to person.
On the other hand, not having enough control over the building industry, surely, has serious consequences. Firstly, it can be hard on the natural environment which may lead to deforestation. That is to say, if the individuals have not been limited to design their habitats, they might knock down trees in order to implement their unique and luxury on their constructions. In the North of Iran, people can build a home in any size and design. Unfortunately, this is an example of chopping down the trees and deforestation. Secondly, uncontrolled construction can annoy the neighborhood's privacy.
In addition, on a wider level, it may also put the resistents at risk which leads to losses of both lives and poverty. In other words, the building that does not have been monitored enough by the government intervention is nor capable of standing earth quiet or flood. Indeed, there are not emergency exit routes and fire control;l system to make them safe. Thus, after natural disaster inhabitants lose their health and poverty as well.
In conclusion, regardless of the benefits, the disadvantages of increasing government control on residents to build their construction can be devastating due to their environmentally damaging and well-being effect which might result in a lack of architecture dictated by the government.
- In some countries people spend a lot of money on their pets They buy special food for their cats or dogs buy them toys and often pay high fees for medical treatment Some people think this is a waste of time What are the advantages and disadvantages of hav 52
- Topic Fossil fuels coal oil natural gas are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy wind energy and solar energy are encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative dev 67
- In some cities there are few controls on the design and construction of homes and other buildings and owners can decide on the style of their houses Do the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks 73
- Today more school leavers are unable to find jobs Discuss the causes of rising unemployment among young adults and suggest solutions 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 573, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'neighborhoods'' or 'neighborhood's'?
Suggestion: neighborhoods'; neighborhood's
...uncontrolled construction can annoy the neighborhoods privacy. In addition, on a wider leve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rchitecture dictated by the government.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34670487106 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14255463361 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547277936963 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4002967735 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.764705882 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5294117647 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35294117647 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276003661541 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883407459664 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468598193055 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14790087002 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466093331155 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.