In some cities of the world, cars are replacing bicycles. However in some other cities, bicycles are replacing cars. What are the reasons for these two developments? In your opinion, which one is better?
These days, it seems that cars are being substituted by bicycles in some cities, while the contrast trend is happening in other cities. These developments are caused by some factors as now will be discussed.
In some cities, bicycles are being replaced by cars for some reasons. The first reason is that people have become wealthier than before. Increased personal wealth means that individuals are more likely to own a ca these days. As a result, bicycles are outnumbered by cars in many cities. The second reason is the development of road networks. Roads are now wider and more available due to the policies of many governments, which makes cars become the most convenient and efficient mean of transportation in many cities. Additionally, the price of cars is not extremely expensive anymore as a result of low taxes, so it is easier to purchase a car than before.
Meanwhile, the opposite change can be explained by some factors. Firstly, in contemporary society, bicycles are becoming more popular as a result of people's concerns for the environment. As people become more aware of the negative impacts of exhaust fumes, which produced by cars to the environment, they tend to change their means of transportation to bicycles to protect the planet. Secondly, the main reason why many people choose to commute by bicycles instead of cars is health. As people become more dependent on cars, cycling is a good way to exercising and stay healthy. Lastly, in many cities today, people are discouraged from using cars due to the higher cost of fuel. As a result, they have to change their transport habits to bicycles.
In conclusion, the transition from cars to bicycles in some cities, and vice versa could be explained by some elements aforementioned. Additionally, I believe that changing our transport habits from cars to bicycles can have beneficial influence on the society as a whole.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01898734177 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85398127203 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496835443038 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6256623878 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5555555556 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300602439907 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104236422772 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953031705269 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199683626213 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543052252084 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.