In some countries, children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough. Advantages/ disadvantages of giving children this message?
In several nations, children are advised to be able to fulfil ambitions if they make an effort. From my perspective, this encouragement, though detrimental to some extent, can prove itself to be promising.
Granted, one might argue that everyone, including children, may not achieve specific goals even when they try their best. This is predicated on the assumption that unchangeable origins can affect children on their way to reach their futuristic achievements. For example, it is seemingly impractical for disabled adolescents to become skillful athletes compared to normal ones. Consequently, these children will be under pressure if adults continue claiming nothing is impossible for them. Furthermore, regarding normal children, when parents believe their offspring have flawless capability, it can lead to arrogance among children. In case the children do not succeed, they can be prone to mental problems.
Nonetheless, I strongly believe that children should be encouraged to have belief in their abilities for two main reasons. First and foremost, a tiny step can be considered as an achievement. To be specific, if children are able to take advantage of their backgrounds to make gradual improvement in life, it means that they successfully face their hardships. Hence, children are much more positive about their capabilities and many aspects of life. Second, children can discover their subtle talents on the way making effort to pursuit their dreams. Otherwise, they will always stay in their comfort zones and never have particular achievements.
In conclusion, children may not totally reach success and they can be overconfident if excessively believing in their abilities, both of which result in pressure when things go against their expectations. However, considering long-term benefits, children should attempt to pursuit any dream to be optimistic and well-rounded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-23 | phuong anh123321 | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...tal to some extent, can prove itself to be promising. Granted, one might argue that everyon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am to be optimistic and well-rounded.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62717770035 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06280695783 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9883975816 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257970361991 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977975201628 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523647499061 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173076407383 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438280187415 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...tal to some extent, can prove itself to be promising. Granted, one might argue that everyon...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...am to be optimistic and well-rounded.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62717770035 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06280695783 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623693379791 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9883975816 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257970361991 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977975201628 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523647499061 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173076407383 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438280187415 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.