Nowadays, it is commonly seen that across the globe, certain employees are getting relatively high wages and therefore some people advocate that this could help to growth and development of a nation. Others, on the other hand, feel that the government authority should constrain the huge amount of salaries to give them and also reduce the number of people who earn high. Before reaching a fair conclusion it is essential to discuss both these views in detail.
Receiving huge amount of salary is certainly good for a person as well as a nation. To begin with, getting massive wages can enhance the economy of a nation. This means that when the employee is receiving huge money as their salary, he or she need to pay more amount of tax to the nation. This tax money can be used for various purposes of a country. Take European country as an example, where the government utilize these money for developing the transportation, health care system and other basic facilities. More over, handsome salary will also improve the standard of living. Thus, this is clear that good salary is not only improve the faces of a nation it also can improve living standard of the people.
However, others argue that issuing much payment to many employees will lead to financial burden to the government. This is because, though, the government is getting income from different sectors, the money will loss tremendously when paying large amount to the public especially high grade employee. As a result, the poor people will not get their entitled money to survive and this situation make them into poverty, unemployment, and some times crime. To cite an example, the number poverty and crime activity level are significantly high in certain region of African countries owing to improper government system.
In conclusion, although the wages will result to improve the nation in many ways, I strongly think that this existing law and order will lead an economic crisis to the country. So the government authorities should ensure a proper guide lines to dispatch the salaries equally to the employees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, it is commonly seen that acros...
^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uce the number of people who earn high. Before reaching a fair conclusion it is essent...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to discuss both these views in detail. Receiving huge amount of salary is cer...
^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...n example, where the government utilize these money for developing the transportation, heal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 443, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...em into poverty, unemployment, and some times crime. To cite an example, the number p...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... owing to improper government system. In conclusion, although the wages will...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00286532951 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56073265803 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547277936963 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4647396604 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257730587125 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0785045862944 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542883880804 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154156152056 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703454996635 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.