The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information on the number of passengers who travelled by underground train in a typical day in London.

It can be seen from the graph that while 100 passengers were travelled at 6. 00 am, the number of passengers rose significantly to a peak of 400 passengers by 8. 00 am. Meanwhile, the figures for 10 .00 and 11. 00 am were well over 150 and exactly 200 passengers respectively. Between 12. 00 and 14. 00 hours, passenger's rate rose slightly from around 280 to 300.

However, from 14. 00 to 16. 00 hours, the number of passengers who travelled by underground train declined dramatically to only 100 from a moderate 300 passengers. At the same time, the data noticed that a tremendous growth took place during 18.00 hours, reaching just below 400 passengers. Thereafter it dropped to 120 passengers at 8. 00pm, before touching at 170 travellers in 21. 00 hours and they then fell just below 150 passengers by 22.00 hours.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that the number of passengers who chose by a British underground train facility was considerably less except during peak hours both morning and in the evening.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...e, the figures for 10 .00 and 11. 00 am were well over 150 and exactly 200 passenger...
^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e, the figures for 10 .00 and 11. 00 am were well over 150 and exactly 200 passenger...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rose slightly from around 280 to 300. However, from 14. 00 to 16. 00 hours, th...
^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thereafter,
...rs, reaching just below 400 passengers. Thereafter it dropped to 120 passengers at 8. 00pm...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 952.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78391959799 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85924790873 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557788944724 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.9738422364 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 63.4666666667 112.824112599 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.2666666667 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14737421225 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504204363712 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674181937454 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131206531732 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744938871227 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 13.2329268293 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.56 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.82 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 11.4329268293 35% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.