As populations grow and cities become more crowded, there is pressure through out the world to construct ever-taller building to provide accommodation and offices. Many people object to such developments, citing the social as well as the physical dangers . do you agree with objections to skyscrapers?
Undoubtedly, constructing number of massive buildings have increased tremendously across the globe for both residential and commercial purposes. However, it is often by some people that it brings enormous problems both socially and physically in society. Nevertheless, I partially agree with this statement which will explain in this essay.
To start with, one of the key benefits of tall building is that it is quite easy to accommodate numerous people in less geographical area because today, world nations are encountering scarcity of land especially in urban areas. Moreover, raising population is also another concern which generally create many issues like, lack of shelter and basic toilet facilities. Aa a result, it is easy to offer accommodation and office blocks for the public.
Another justification is that skyscrapers constantly provide outstanding look and aesthetic faction in particular area like Bangalore in India. Furthermore, it also can generate revenues to the government when foreigners and sightseers visit those areas because it will be lured by them. For example, The Opera house in Australia an Australia and Burg tower in Dubai are the prime symbol of current architectural wonders these days and the authority can collect the tax for the maintenance of those buildings.
In contrast, tall buildings are often a greater risk of crumbling down. If any destruction takes place, it will seriously affect the entire area of buildings take destroyed world trade centre in the US as an example. Consequently, it will creates issues such as pollution, business, local accommodation and so on. These are the minor distraction in the face of the enormous benefits that such a multi-storey building can bring.
To conclude, massive buildings have both positive and negative side, however, I think that if it should be preserved in the right manner from natural calamities, otherwise it will ruin the nation's economy significantly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Undoubtedly, constructing number of massive buildings have increas...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...over, raising population is also another concern which generally create many issu...
^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eigners and sightseers visit those areas because it will be lured by them. For ex...
^^
Line 13, column 240, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...US as an example. Consequently, it will creates issues such as pollution, business, loc...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... calamities, otherwise it will ruin the nations economy significantly.
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ruin the nations economy significantly.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, for example, i think, in contrast, in particular, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47213114754 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03645502583 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619672131148 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2911928834 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.214285714 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124901203078 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406554329216 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291363910613 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626360005534 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385173164031 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.