In some countries, it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In some countries it is forbidden to reject job applications because of applicants ages. Even though some peole think that companies have right to reject any application without stating any reason, goverenments force employers to give equal opportunities to every applicant. I think this have some positive and negative effects.
In some jobs like construction and heavy industrial jobs, a worker should be phsysically fit to complete the assaignement given to him, so companies try to increase their chances of reaching the correct person by prohibiting applications of older people. Also it becomes more and more harder to get along with developing technology by age so that education is becoming a great expense for some employers. Because of these factors most of industry leading airline companies have maximum age limits for pilots and cabin crew.
On the other hand there are also a lot of companies belive that great experience comes with older ages. Those companies instead of prohibiting applications of older people they even state minimum age limits for applicants in their job openings. This kind of companies are mostly does experience oriented jobs like television programming or film making. They prefer experience of older people over young people’s fresh ideas.
So that every employer have different requirementes. While some of them are looking for physically fit and powerfull workers some of them just look for experienced brains to generate innoviative ideas. Because of this situation I think that restricting rejection of job applications just because of applicants ages is a negative developement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ohibiting applications of older people. Also it becomes more and more harder to get ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'harder' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: harder
... older people. Also it becomes more and more harder to get along with developing technology...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ver young people's fresh ideas. So that every employer have different requireme...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, i think, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45669291339 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9809363918 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582677165354 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2952033322 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.615384615 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303280840634 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105278985658 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626446879037 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18526854466 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340439648571 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.