In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is true that refusal of job application based on age limits has been spreading rapidly, and this would be unlawful in some countries. However, in this essay explain about the good movement of such countries and describe the benefits of this trend become illicit too.
Initially, every citizen have the right to do any job irrespective of age. While, certain companies and industries banned some old age people or set some limit to the age. In brief, having a job to fulfill life needs and maintain sustainable livelihood would be an ultimate aim of everyone. Make use of aged employees would lead to profitability as per the experience and life time establishment. Get ride of such person would be a detrimental effect on society and individual well being. For instance, escalating old age homes and slum persons would be the after effect of this unemployment by the age restrictions. Thereby taking action by the legislation would make reduction in poverty and wellness of individual and entrepreneurs.
On the other hand, those who applied age barrier as illegal makes up many youngsters and graduates become employed. In other words, many graduates become unemployed as per the age limits after completion of many years of learning process. Universities and professional emerging criteria of multiple degree lead to over age for some students. Moreover, highly educated young employees become the forthcoming scientists and experts and so limiting age might be destroy their mind in some extent. For example, many genius working in NASA were highly professionals and holding many degree without considering age to study and opting job.
To sum up, although, some jobs has some dilemma to finish up by the cause of age related issues, many peoples have the courage to do any works at any age periods. Take legislation over this prohibited rules would mitigate a detrimental effects on poverty and unemployment's and flourish the overall development of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...profitability as per the experience and life time establishment. Get ride of such person ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...er completion of many years of learning process. Universities and professional emerging...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in brief, in other words, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.175 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87798079172 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584375 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.7904261206 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221685683966 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076102700959 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456624816481 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142087386453 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00886210072835 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.